Volume 1 - 4/2020, Original articles, 236-241

Case report, 228-231 | DOI: 10.53260/GREM.201045

A Sertoli-Leydig tumor in an 18-year-old patient

Denise Ladowsky, Eugenia Lamas Majek, Ignacio Maccio, Mariano Volpacchio, Silvina Di Lella, Vanesa Straminsky, Samanta Peri Cruzado Peri Cruzado, Viviana Mesch, Florencia Falcon, Silvio Tatti, Gladys Fernández

The effect of supplementation with vitamin D plus calcium on fetal growth. An ultrasound and clinical study.

DOI: doi.org/10.53260/GREM.201047 | Citation

Lorena Sabonet-Morente, Ester Ortiz , Cristina Gomis-Gozalbo , Juan Tarín, Juan-José Hidalgo , Antonio Cano

  • Lorena Sabonet-Morente Service of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Materno-Infantil, 29011 Málaga
  • Ester Ortiz Service of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario Dr Peset, 46017 Valencia
  • Cristina Gomis-Gozalbo Service of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valencia 46010
  • Juan Tarín Department of Cellular Biology, Functional Biology and Physical Anthropology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Valencia, Burjassot, 46100 Valencia, Spain,
  • Juan-José Hidalgo Service of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valencia 46010, and Universidad Jaime I, 12071 Castellón
  • Antonio Cano CONTACT Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Abstract

Background and Purpose

There is discrepancy in the literature on whether supplementation with vitamin D (cholecalciferol) during pregnancy may impact fetal growth. While associating calcium with cholecalciferol may have an additional impact, the issue has been barely studied to date. We investigated whether supplementation with cholecalciferol plus calcium had an effect on indicators of fetal growth.

Methods

Normal pregnant women were randomized to usual care or supplemented with 1,000 IU cholecalciferol plus 1,200 mg elemental calcium daily from the 20th till the 30th week of pregnancy. Fetal growth was assessed by measuring femoral development parameters with 3D ultrasound over that pregnancy window and by evaluating birthweight. Data were analyzed by Student’s t-test, ANOVA and ANCOVA.

Results

Ninety-eight women completed the trial. Cholecalciferol levels increased from 18.6 1.2 (3-36) to 24.9  1.3 (7.5-51.5) ng/mL [mean  SEM (range)] in the supplemented group while they remained stable in the controls (p<0.05). No difference was found in fetal femoral parameters, i.e. femoral length (FL) and distal cross-sectional metaphyseal area (DMA), between the groups at the 30th week, with values of 5.22  0.04 cm and 0.62  0.01 cm2, respectively, recorded in the supplemented group vs 5.18  0.04 cm and 0.55  0.02 cm2 in the controls. Furthermore, no between-groups difference was found in the ratios between values for both femoral parameters at the 30th and 20th week. The values for the splaying index, which integrates length and cross-sectional area, and the ratio between their 30th and the 20th week values, were also similar between groups.

Conclusions

Supplementation with calcium plus cholecalciferol did not lead to differences in femoral growth or birthweight when used for an interval at mid-pregnancy. The potential effect of a longer intervention, or of a higher dose of cholecalciferol and/or calcium, is still unclear.

Full article PDF

Full Article

INTRODUCTION

The association between maternal vitamin D levels and fetal growth is a matter of debate. A systematic review concluded that evidence in favor of a direct relationship is conflicting because of the heterogeneity of existing studies [1]. A series of physiological mechanisms, though, supports the association. The promoters of some amino acid transporter genes include vitamin D response elements, and maternal levels of vitamin D are positively associated with the expression of genes implicated in amino acid transport in the placenta [2]. Whether supplementation with vitamin D may have an effect, however, has been poorly investigated. A study in India, where hypovitaminosis D is highly prevalent, found that vitamin D supplementation improved weight, length and head circumference in the newborn [3]. However, a subsequent randomized controlled trial, the Maternal gestational vitamin D supplementation and offspring bone health (MAVIDOS) study, did not detect any effect on whole-body bone mineral content and somatometric features at birth [4].The growth and mineralization of the fetal skeleton requires adequate transplacental transfer of calcium. This process is favored by increased intestinal calcium absorption in the mother, an important function of vitamin D [5]. However, the effect of associating calcium with vitamin D in pregnancy has been poorly investigated, with outcomes restricted to the impact on preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, preterm birth and neonatal death [1]. There are, however, some indirect indications that calcium supplementation might have an effect on birthweight [6].Thanks to the possibility of exploring, through high-resolution three-dimensional ultrasound, how growth evolves along fetal life, it has been confirmed that femoral growth from 19 to 34 weeks of pregnancy is a critical period that strongly associates with proximal femoral geometry at 6 years. This suggests a long-term predictive potential in relation to later skeletal growth [7]. Studies using that technology have shown that the mother’s circulating levels of vitamin D are associated with the distal metaphyseal cross-sectional area [8], and with femoral volume at 34 weeks of pregnancy [9].  We designed a randomized study to investigate whether supplementation with vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) plus calcium along that specific pregnancy window would have an impact on femoral growth and geometry, as measured with 3D ultrasound at mid-gestation, and on birthweight.

METHODS

Patients and explorations

Women at the 12th week of pregnancy attending their first prenatal screening visit at our center, which serves a population of low socioeconomic level, were invited to participate. The inclusion criteria were age 18-45 years, no accompanying comorbidities, and a body mass index (BMI) between 20 and 40 kg/m2. Women whose pregnancies were obtained through assisted reproductive technology or with multiple pregnancies were not eligible.

Upon acceptance, a structured anamnesis and a basic exploration were performed. A first routine ultrasound assessment was carried out with the purpose of confirming the gestational age and completing the prenatal study. Women were instructed to continue using the poly-vitamin preparation prescribed at their primary care center, which included 200 UI cholecalciferol daily, and were given an appointment for a further visit at the 20th week. All participants were using the same preparation, as per protocol in the health department to which our center refers.

At the further visit, an analytical study was performed in addition to the routine clinical checks and basic exploration.  Blood for analysis was drawn between 08.00 and 10.00 a.m. after an overnight fast. Basic biochemical parameters were analyzed using enzymatic methods with an auto-analyzer (Olympus AV 5200; Tokyo, Japan). Vitamin D was quantified with the Elecsys vitamin D total assay (Roche Diagnostics International, Totkreuz, CH), which measures 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) by an electro-chemiluminescence binding procedure. The Elecsys coefficients of variation  were £6.5% (within-run) and £11.5% (between-run). Three sub-categories were established according to the circulating levels of 25OHD: deficient when <10 ng/mL, insufficient when 10-20 ng/mL, and sufficient when >20 ng/mL [10]. At this same appointment, women were assigned, according to a randomized, unblinded protocol, to either usual care (UC group) or to the calcium plus vitamin D (CD group) treatment. Treatment in the CD group consisted of calcium carbonate, in a dose equivalent to 1200 mg elemental calcium, plus 1000 IU cholecalciferol divided into two doses, at breakfast and dinner, each day. Women were seen again at the 30th week. An ultrasound assessment of fetal femoral volume was performed at both the 20th-week and the 30th-week visits. Adherence to the treatment was ascertained from the women’s self-reports, which were verified against prescription reports recorded by their primary care physicians, visible in their electronic charts.

The study was approved by the ethics committee at our center. Informed written consent was obtained from each participant, who had first been informed of the purpose of the study.

Ultrasound measurement of fetal femoral volume

An experienced operator explored the fetal femur with a Voluson 730 Expert (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, US) machine fitted with a curvilinear 3D transducer, with a frequency range of 2 to 5 Mhz. The multiplanar imaging mode was used to identify anatomical structures and optimize the anatomical slices. The splaying index, as described by Mahon et al. [8], was defined as the ratio between an anatomical landmark consisting of the distal cross-sectional metaphyseal area (DMA), expressed in cm2, and the femoral length (FL), expressed in cm.

Both the FL and the DMA were measured in triplicate and the corresponding mean results were taken as the values for analyses. The 20th and the 30th week replicate assessments in 25 pregnancies were used to calculate precision. In our hands, the coefficients of variation for FL were 0.7% at 20 weeks and 0.6% at 30 weeks, whereas those for DMA were 4.2% and 3.8%, respectively.

Statistical analysis

Continuous data were analyzed by applying Student’s t-test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Proportions were analyzed by chi-squared test after applying Yates’ continuity correction in 2x2 tables. The covariates age, BMI and parity were included in ANCOVA tests in order to control for the potential effects of these confounders. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov one-sample test was used to check whether variables were normally distributed.  If the normality assumption was violated, logarithmic or square root transformation of the variable was applied to induce normality. The Levene test was applied to assess the null hypothesis that variances were homogeneous between groups. Statistical significance was defined as p≤ 0.05. Unless otherwise specified, the values shown in the text, tables and figures are means ± SEM. The entire statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (IBM SPSS Statistics, version 22).

RESULTS

A total of 98 out of the 101 initially randomized women completed the trial. Figure 1 shows the flowchart of the study, in which 49 women completed each of the protocols. The distribution of the delivered infants [males (n=46) and females (n=52)] was even between the groups. Table 1 shows that the baseline clinical characteristics of the women were similar between the groups. The ethnic origin of the women was mainly Caucasian (n=78, 77.2%), the remaining 23 being Latin American mestizo (n=18) and Asian (n=5) women.

The baseline levels of 25OHD were similar between the UC group (18.7 ± 1.3, range 4-45, ng/mL) and the CD group (18.6 ± 1.2, range 3-36 ng/mL). The intervention led to an increase in the CD group, which reached 24.9 ± 1.3 (range 7.5-51.5) ng/mL vs the 20.9 ± 1.4 (range 3.1-41) recorded in the UC group (p= 0.049). The ratio between the 30th week and the 20th week values was also significantly different between groups (p= 0.004). Figure 2 shows how the three categories (deficient, insufficient and normal) were distributed in each group at the 20th week and at the 30th week. The increase was not accompanied by changes in the serum levels of total calcium and phosphate (data not shown).

The FL at 20 weeks was similar between the groups, being 3.62 ± 0.03 cm in the UC group and 3.57 ± 0.04 cm in the CD group. Similarly, there were no significant differences in the corresponding values at the 30th week: 5.22 ± 0.04 cm vs 5.18 ± 0.04 cm, or in the 30th week: 20th week ratios, which were 1.448 ± 0.017 (UC group) and 1.455 ± 0.015 (CD group).

The DMA at 20 weeks was 0.26 ± 0.10 cm2 in the UC group and 0.29 ± 0.01 cm2 in the CD group. The values increased in both groups, to reach 0.55 ± 0.02 cm2 in the UC group and 0.62 ± 0.01 cm2 in the CD group at 30 weeks. The ratio between the values recorded at the 30th week and the 20th week, which proved more informative of the progression in both groups, was 2.22 ± 0.09 in the UC group and 2.20 ± 0.09 in the CD group, a non-significant difference.

The splaying index (cm/cm2), which integrated FL and DMA, was 0.07 ± 0.01 and 0.11 ± 0.01 in the UC group, and 0.08 ± 0.01 and 0.12 ± 0.01 in the CD group at the 20th and the 30th weeks, respectively. As for the DMA, two groups showed similar ratios between the splaying index values recorded at the 30th week and the 20th week.

Delivery occurred at a similar gestational age in both groups. Birthweight did not differ significantly between the groups, being (mean ± SEM, g) 3,365.9  60.3 (range 2,220-4,120) in the UC group and 3,350.8 ± 57.4 (range 2,410-4,490) in the CD group.

DISCUSSION

The main feature of our study is that it included patients supplemented with calcium plus vitamin D as opposed to only vitamin D. The bone benefits deriving from this association have been confirmed in classical studies on osteoporosis, as shown in systematic reviews [11,12], although the issue is not without debate [13]. Also of interest in this study is the fact that we explored, for the first time, the impact of an intervention on specific developmental traits of the fetal femur at mid-gestation. This novel approach  was possible thanks to advances in ultrasound technology, which allowed us to examine the specific structural response of the femur, an important element in the fetal skeleton.

We did not detect any effect of the association of vitamin D and calcium. This neutral effect is consistent with the lack of differences in birthweight between groups, a finding also reported in the literature in studies evaluating only vitamin D supplementation [14,4]. Even so, several questions arise.

 One concerns the possibility that the intervention may have been too short in time and may have used doses that were too low. We supplemented with 1000 IU cholecalciferol per day, a dose in line with what is reported in recent studies [4]. That supplementation saw the baseline mean of 18.6 ng/mL increase to 24.9 ng/mL, and the percentage of women with levels above 20 ng/mL increase from 39% to 59%. However, 41% of the participants remained below the threshold of 20 ng/mL, which, applying the criteria used for the non-pregnant-state, corresponds to deficiency. This information is of interest because the circulating levels in the fetus are known to reflect those in the mother [15]. However, data from a combined cohort of two randomized supplementation trials in the US in which women received up to 4000 IU vitamin D3/day showed that the birthweight of neonates delivered by treated mothers did not differ from that seen in the usual care control group. Women treated with 4000 IU attained a mean 25OHD value of 41.9 ng/mL, which is almost twice that recorded in our cohort [14].

But that is not unanimous in the literature. The aforementioned study in India [3] detected a significant increase in birthweight. Of interest, though, the mean 25OHD in the mothers was only 23.5 ng/mL, similar to the value recorded our study. Similar positive results were found in Iran by investigators who attained 47.8 ng/mL in mothers assigned to the intervention group [16]. The possibility that socioeconomic level, lower in India and Iran as compared with the US, might have a conditioning effect is a possible explanation for the detected divergence. Against that interpretation, other investigators from the same countries failed to reproduce the claimed effect [17,18].

Another specific characteristic of our study was that usual care in our center meant supplementation with a poly-vitamin combination including 200 IU cholecalciferol.  This intervention is unlikely to have obscured a potential effect of cholecalciferol as the circulating levels of 25OHD were significantly different between the two groups. Also, in our study, the intervention lasted 10 weeks, from the 20th to the 30th week of pregnancy. We focused on this period as it was the window we planned to examine with 3D ultrasound, as done in a previous study [8].The association of 1200 elemental calcium with 1000 IU cholecalciferol is an innovative aspect of our study. It ensured that the women in our treated group achieved the estimated average calcium intake recommended by scientific societies and governmental bodies during pregnancy [19,20]. Accordingly, it is very unlikely that any potential action of vitamin D was limited by insufficiencies in calcium intake. This is an important point, because while the impact of vitamin D supplementation on fetal growth is debated, a systematic review did detect some potential effect associated with calcium supplementation [6], something further suggested in a subsequent analysis [21]. It is also worth mentioning that our protocol associating calcium with cholecalciferol abrogated the risk of so-called maternal calcium metabolic stress, a specific status defined by a very low calcium intake, insufficient vitamin D, and elevated parathyroid hormone (PTH). The concatenated action of those three agents has been demonstrated to impact fetal growth [22]. It is of interest that babies born to mothers with calcium metabolic stress showed the features previously described in studies of vitamin D intervention in low socioeconomic environments, i.e., low birthweight and reductions in length and head circumference. Whether the concurrent supplementation of calcium might have limited that effect is an unproven assumption.In conclusion, in the context of an emerging interest in the impact of nutritional intervention on fetal growth, our study adds some data of interest. Our study is novel in two ways: first in that we added calcium to vitamin D, and second in that, thanks to modern ultrasound technology, we finely explored the intrauterine behavior of the fetal femur, an element offering crucial information for finely assessing fetal growth. Despite the low socioeconomic background of our group, which may be considered closer to that of women from less developed countries, we noted no discernible effect of the intervention. More studies evaluating protocols with varying dosages or treatment duration, as well as the investigation of other potential actors, like PTH, might help to clarify the issue.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Media

Figure 1
Figure 1 Flowchart of the study protocol.
Table 1
Table 1 Clinical characteristics of women in the UC and the CD groups.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Distribution of serum levels of 25 hydroxy-vitamin D according to the 3 categories, deficient (<10 ng/mL), insufficient (10-20 ng/mL), and sufficient (>20 ng/mL) at the 20th and the 30th week of pregnancy. Panels correspond to women receiving usual care (200 IU cholecalciferol daily, panel A, 49 women) and to women supplemented with 1,000 IU cholecalciferol and 1,200 mg elemental calcium daily (panel B, 49 women).

References

  1. Palacios C, Kostiuk LK, Peña-Rosas JP. Vitamin D supplementation for women during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(1):CD008873.
  2. Cleal JK, Day PE, Simner CL, et al; SWS Study Group. Placental amino acid transport may be regulated by maternal vitamin D and vitamin D-binding protein: results from the Southampton Women’s Survey. Br J Nutr. 2015;113:1903-10.
  3. Kalra P, Das V, Agarwal A, et al. Effect of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy on neonatal mineral homeostasis and anthropometry of the newborn and infant. Br J Nutr. 2012;108:1052-8.
  4. Cooper C, Harvey NC, Bishop NJ, et al; MAVIDOS Study Group. Maternal gestational vitamin D supplementation and offspring bone health (MAVIDOS): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4:393-402.
  5. Sanz-Salvador L, García-Pérez MÁ, Tarín JJ, Cano A. Bone metabolic changes during pregnancy: a period of vulnerability to osteoporosis and fracture. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;172:R53-65.
  6. Buppasiri P, Lumbiganon P, Thinkhamrop J, Ngamjarus C, Laopaiboon M, Medley N. Calcium supplementation (other than for preventing or treating hypertension) for improving pregnancy and infant outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(2):CD007079.
  7. Harvey NC, Cole ZA, Crozier SR, et al; Southampton Women’s Survey Study Group. Fetal and infant growth predict hip geometry at 6 y old: findings from the Southampton Women’s Survey. Pediatr Res. 2013;74:450-6.
  8. Mahon P, Harvey N, Crozier S, et al; WS Study Group. Low maternal vitamin D status and fetal bone development: cohort study. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25:14-9.
  9. Ioannou C, Javaid MK, Mahon P, et al. The effect of maternal vitamin D concentration on fetal bone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:E2070-7.
  10. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee to Review Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin D and Calcium. Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D. Ross AC, Taylor CL, Yaktine AL, Del Valle HB, editors. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2011.
  11. Boonen S, Lips P, Bouillon R, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Vanderschueren D, Haentjens Need for additional calcium to reduce the risk of hip fracture with vitamin d supplementation: evidence from a comparative metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:1415-23.
  12. Weaver CM, Alexander DD, Boushey CJ, et al. Calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and risk of fractures: an updated meta-analysis from the National Osteoporosis Foundation. Osteoporos Int. 2016;27:367-76.
  13. Zhao JG, Zeng XT, Wang J, Liu L. Association Between Calcium or Vitamin D Supplementation and Fracture Incidence in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. 2017;318:2466-82.
  14. Wagner CL, McNeil RB, Johnson DD, et al. Health characteristics and outcomes of two randomized vitamin D supplementation trials during pregnancy: a combined analysis. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2013;136:313-20.
  15. Zasimovich A, Fijałkowska A, Chełchowska M, Maciejewski T. Maternal serum vitamin D and parathormone concentrations during gestation and in umbilical cord blood – pilot study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31:158-63.
  16. Hashemipour S, Ziaee A, Javadi A, et al. Effect of treatment of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency during pregnancy on fetal growth indices and maternal weight gain: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;172:15-9.
  17. Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi S, Mirghafourvand M, Mansouri A, Najafi M, Khodabande F. The Effect of Vitamin D and Calcium plus Vitamin D during Pregnancy on Pregnancy and Birth Outcomes: a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Caring Sci. 2015;4:35-44.
  18. Asemi Z, Samimi M, Siavashani MA, et al. Calcium-Vitamin D Co-supplementation Affects Metabolic Profiles, but not Pregnancy Outcomes, in Healthy Pregnant Women. Int J Prev Med. 2016;7:49.
  19. National Institutes of Health. Calcium – Fact Sheet for Health Professionals. Available at: https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/Calcium-HealthProfessional/. Accessed April 12, 2020.
  20. Royal Osteoporosis Society. https://nos.org.uk/information/healthy-living-and-risk/healthy-eating-for-strong-bones/. Accessed April 12, 2020.
  21. Thompson WD, Tyrrell J, Borges MC, et al. Association of maternal circulating 25(OH)D and calcium with birth weight: a mendelian randomisation analysis. PLoS Med. 2019;16:e1002828.
  22. Scholl TO, Chen X, Stein TP. Maternal calcium metabolic stress and fetal growth. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;99:918-25.

Keywords: , , , ,

Citation: Sabonet-Morente L.,Ortiz E.,Gomis-Gozalbo C.,Tarín J.,Hidalgo J.,Cano A., The effect of supplementation with vitamin D plus calcium on fetal growth. An ultrasound and clinical study., GREM Gynecological and Reproductive Endocrinology & Metabolism (2020); Volume 1 - 4/2020:236-241 doi: 10.53260/GREM.201047

Published: November 25, 2020